Discussion Grading Rubric
| Category | The work is complete and supported by meaningful and relevant evidence | The work is mostly good, but it’s either incomplete or has minor mistakes | The work has major mistakes, or several key parts are missing | There is no work, or the work violates the laws of nature as we know it |
| Discussion Content | 70 points
This section meets all of the following requirements:
The presented content has no mistakes in the interpretation of the data or concepts. |
55 points
This section is missing 1 of the requirements.
The presented content has only minor mistakes in the interpretation of the data or concepts. |
30 points
This section is missing 2 of the requirements.
The presented content has 1 or 2 major mistakes in the interpretation of the data or concepts. |
0 points
The section is missing or contains more than 5 major mistakes that contradict the laws of nature. |
| Scientific Language and Grammar | 20 points
The discussion meets all of the following requirements:
|
15 points
The discussion is missing 1 of the requirements. |
5 points
The discussion is missing 2 of the requirements. |
0 points
The discussion is missing, or the meaning of the text can’t be understood even after a second read. |
| Discussion Format | 10 points
The discussion meets all of the following requirements:
|
8 points
The discussion is missing 1 of the requirements. |
5 points
The discussion is missing 2 of the requirements. |
0 points
The discussion is missing. |